"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Comments, objections? Also, any thoughts about the names to use for
> these new node types? As I commented last year, I'm not completely
> happy with "TopPlan" because it won't actually be a subtype of Plan,
> but I don't have a better idea. Also I'm unsure what to call the
> cut-down RangeTblEntry struct; maybe RunTimeRangeTblEntry?
My only though is that I suspect this will somehow relate to the cte stuff I
was doing for recursive queries. I'm not exactly clear how yet though.
I think this has more to do with the RangeTable stuff than the TopPlan though.
I was probably going to need a new kind of RangeTable representing a Subquery
that was a reference to a cte rather than a separate subquery.
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
