Re: Instances where enable_seqscan = false is good - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gregory Stark
Subject Re: Instances where enable_seqscan = false is good
Date
Msg-id 87lkbmhkr1.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Instances where enable_seqscan = false is good  (Ow Mun Heng <Ow.Mun.Heng@wdc.com>)
List pgsql-general
"Ow Mun Heng" <Ow.Mun.Heng@wdc.com> writes:

> Have not changed anything in that area. Question is.. Do I need to? or
> should I try out something just to see how it is?
> (any) Recommendations would be good.

Sorry, I don't have all the original plans. Can you post the explain analyze
with and without enable_seqscan now that the stats are giving good
predictions?

--
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Statistics collection question
Next
From: Alban Hertroys
Date:
Subject: Re: Statistics collection question