Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> writes:
> IS this same issue true for hash or GiST indexes?
I think that's true, afaik rtree, GiST, and hash are all not WAL-logged.
> On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 13:49, Dann Corbit wrote:
> > I suggest a warning (if there is not already one generated) on create
> > index for rtree indexes so that users know that they are not fully
> > supported.
I'm not sure what he means by "supported" though. I'm getting all the support
I'm paying for, plus a whole lot more.
--
greg
