Re: Standalone synchronous master - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: Standalone synchronous master
Date
Msg-id 87k45jpe4k.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Standalone synchronous master  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> If you don't care about the absolute guarantee of data, why not just
> use async replication? It's still going to replicate the data over to
> the client as quickly as it can - which in the end is the same level
> of guarantee that you get with this switch set, isn't it?

Isn't that equivalent to setting synchronous_standby_names to '' and
reloading the server?

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Björnhagen
Date:
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master