Re: Why is restored database faster? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: Why is restored database faster?
Date
Msg-id 87iskgugpe.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why is restored database faster?  (David Shadovitz <david@shadovitz.com>)
Responses Re: Why is restored database faster?  (Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
List pgsql-performance
David Shadovitz <david@shadovitz.com> writes:
> What could account for this difference?

Lots of things -- disk fragmentation, expired tuples that aren't being
cleaned up by VACUUM due to a long-lived transaction, the state of the
kernel buffer cache, the configuration of the kernel, etc.

> How can I get the original server to perform as well as the new one?

Well, you can start by giving us some more information. For example,
what is the output of VACUUM VERBOSE on the slow server? How much disk
space does the database directory take up on both machines?

(BTW, "SELECT count(*) FROM table" isn't a particularly good DBMS
performance indication...)

-Neil


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: David Shadovitz
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is VACUUM ANALYZE so slow?
Next
From: Shridhar Daithankar
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is restored database faster?