Re: [SPAM] Re: posix_fadvise v22 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gregory Stark
Subject Re: [SPAM] Re: posix_fadvise v22
Date
Msg-id 87iqowt3ba.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: posix_fadvise v22  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [SPAM] Re: posix_fadvise v22  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:

> On Friday 02 January 2009 06:49:57 Greg Stark wrote:
>> The guc run-time check is checking for known-buggy versions of glibc  
>> using sysconf to check what version of glibc you have.
>
> Could you please mention the bug number in the relevant source code comments?

It's Debian bug# 312406 which was fixed in Debian release 2.3.5-3. So it's
probably one of these but searching for posix_fadvise doesn't find anything in
their bug tracker:
   Version 2.3.6
   * The following bugs are resolved with this release:
     38, 253, 549, 622, 653, 721, 758, 851, 877, 915, 934, 955, 961,     1016, 1037, 1076, 1079, 1080, 1081, 1082,
1083,1084, 1085, 1086,     1087, 1088, 1090, 1091, 1092, 1093, 1094, 1095, 1096, 1097, 1098,     1099, 1100, 1101,
1102,1103, 1104, 1105, 1106, 1107, 1108, 1109,     1110, 1111, 1112, 1113, 1125, 1137, 1138, 1249, 1250, 1251, 1252,
1253, 1254, 1350, 1358, 1394, 1438, 1498, 1534 
     Visit <http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/> for the details of each bug.


--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions