"Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> People don't want the ICU or glibc data and there's no other source as
> readily available.
>
> Perhaps we should fix that problem, rather than making more
> workarounds.
Fix the problem by making ICU a smaller less complex dependency?
Or fix the problem that glibc isn't everyone's libc?
I think realistically we're basically waiting for strcoll_l to become
standardized by POSIX so we can depend on it.
Personally I think we should just implement our own strcoll_l as a wrapper
around setlocale-strcoll-setlocale and use strcoll_l if it's available and
our, possibly slow, wrapper if not. If we ban direct use of strcoll and other
lc_collate sensitive functions in Postgres we could also remember the last
locale used and not do unnecessary setlocales so existing use cases aren't
slowed down at all.
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
