David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 23:40, Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213@163.com> wrote:
>>
>> David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
>> > If you don't want the planner to use the statistics for the column why
>> > not just do the following?
>>
>> Acutally I didn't want the planner to ignore the statistics totally, I
>> want the planner to treat the "Const" which probably miss optimizer part
>> average, which is just like what we did for generic plan for the blow
>> query.
>
> I'm with Andrei on this one and agree with his "And it is just luck
> that you've got the right answer".
Any example to support this conclusion? and what's the new problem after
this?
--
Best Regards
Andy Fan
