Re: Bug in new buffer freelist code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: Bug in new buffer freelist code
Date
Msg-id 87d69vppst.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in new buffer freelist code  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Bug in new buffer freelist code
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> It might also be worthwhile to add another BM_FLAG bit that
> specifically indicates a buffer is on the freelist, and
> set/clear/test that at appropriate spots.

ISTM that BM_FREE should indicate this, or am I misunderstanding you?

-Neil



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in new buffer freelist code
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in new buffer freelist code