Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> writes:
> I think so. It would be better to remove the CVC support and related code.
Will isolate that into another branch just in case and prepare a patch
with that removed.
> Preloading modules that defines CVC is a good direction to fix the issue,
> but we need more consideration about where to do it.
I checked for doing that too, but both shared_preload_libraries and
local_preload_libraries are managed way earlier than the point where we
can connect to a database a check what extensions it contains. So that
appeared to me as a dead-end.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
