Re: Security question UNIX Sockets vs CIDR style access - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Chris Browne
Subject Re: Security question UNIX Sockets vs CIDR style access
Date
Msg-id 87bpp7hpqr.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Security question UNIX Sockets vs CIDR style access  (Kevin Kempter <kevink@consistentstate.com>)
List pgsql-admin
kevink@consistentstate.com (Kevin Kempter) writes:
> I'm looking for thoughts/feedback on the use of UNIX Sockets vs standard CIDR style access (i,e, Ident, MD5, etc) to
aPostgres Cluster. What are the 
> pros/cons, which is more secure and why, etc...

There is no single answer, which is essentially why there is the whole
array of access methods.

Each has reasons to be preferable under particular circumstances, and
there is a fair bit of documentation on this in the standard
documentation.

Please see:
   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/auth-methods.html
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="linuxdatabases.info" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];;
http://cbbrowne.com/info/sgml.html
"Over a hundred years ago, the German poet Heine
 warned the French not to underestimate the power of ideas:
 philosophical concepts nurtured in the stillness of a
 professor's study could destroy a civilization."
    --Isaiah Berlin in /The Power of Ideas/

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Andy Shellam
Date:
Subject: Re: Security question UNIX Sockets vs CIDR style access
Next
From: Kenny W Drobnack
Date:
Subject: rotating log files and adding timestamps to postgres logs