"Andreas Joseph Krogh" <andreak@officenet.no> writes:
> Ooops, just fugured that out. But - it still doesn't use the index if I remove
> the "varchar_pattern_ops". I solved it by adding a function:
Hm, well it does for me, you would have to post your explain analyze to see
what's going on.
> Another question then: Why doesn't "varchar_pattern_ops" handle ordering? This
> means I need 2 indexes on the columns I want to match with LIKE and ORDER BY.
> Just doesn't seem right to need 2 "similar" indexes...
If you initd in the C locale you only need one index. In other locales the
collation order and the pattern order are different.
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
