Re: Strange performance degregation in sql function (PG11.1) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andrew Gierth
Subject Re: Strange performance degregation in sql function (PG11.1)
Date
Msg-id 87a7fjdv1k.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Strange performance degregation in sql function (PG11.1)  (Alastair McKinley <a.mckinley@analyticsengines.com>)
Responses Re: Strange performance degregation in sql function (PG11.1)
List pgsql-general
>>>>> "Alastair" == Alastair McKinley <a.mckinley@analyticsengines.com> writes:

 Alastair> Hi all,

 Alastair> I recently experienced a performance degradation in an
 Alastair> operational system that I can't explain. I had a function
 Alastair> wrapper for a aggregate query that was performing well using
 Alastair> the expected indexes with the approximate structure as shown
 Alastair> below.

 Alastair> create or replace function example_function(param1 int, param2 int) returns setof custom_type as
 Alastair> $$
 Alastair>     select * from big_table where col1 = param1 and col2 = param2;
 Alastair> $$ language sql;

This function isn't inlinable due to missing a STABLE qualifier; that's
a pretty big issue.

Without inlining, the function will be run only with generic plans,
which means that the decision about index usage will be made without
knowledge of the parameter values.

Was your actual function inlinable? See
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Inlining_of_SQL_functions

You can get the query plan of a non-inlined function using the
auto_explain module (with its log_nested_statements option). The query
plan of non-inlined function calls is not otherwise shown by EXPLAIN.

 Alastair> After creating two new indexes on this table to support a
 Alastair> different use case during a migration, this unchanged
 Alastair> function reduced in performance by several orders of
 Alastair> magnitude. Running the query inside the function manually on
 Alastair> the console however worked as expected and the query plan did
 Alastair> not appear to have changed.

But when you run it manually, you'll get a custom plan, based on the
parameter values.

 Alastair> On a hunch I changed the structure of the function to the
 Alastair> structure below and immediately the query performance
 Alastair> returned to the expected baseline.

 Alastair> create or replace function example_function(param1 int, param2 int) returns setof custom_type as
 Alastair> $$
 Alastair> BEGIN
 Alastair>     return query execute format($query$
 Alastair>         select * from big_table where col1 = %1$L and col2 = %1$
 Alastair>     $query$,param1,param2);
 Alastair> END;
 Alastair> $$ language plpgsql;

Using EXECUTE in plpgsql will get you a custom plan every time (though
you really should have used EXECUTE USING rather than interpolating the
parameters into the query string).

I suggest looking into the inlining question first.

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron
Date:
Subject: Re: bigint out of range
Next
From: "Peter J. Holzer"
Date:
Subject: Re: bigint out of range