Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 2023-04-12 We 01:48, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 3:04 PM Thomas Munro<thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 2:56 PM Christoph Berg<myon@debian.org> wrote:
>>>> I'm hitting a panic in t_004_io_direct. The build is running on
>>>> overlayfs on tmpfs/ext4 (upper/lower) which is probably a weird
>>>> combination but has worked well for building everything over the last
>>>> decade. On Debian unstable:
>>>>
>>>> PANIC: could not open file "pg_wal/000000010000000000000001": Invalid argument
>>> ... I have a new idea: perhaps it is possible to try
>>> to open a file with O_DIRECT from perl, and if it fails like that,
>>> skip the test. Looking into that now.
>> I think I have that working OK. Any Perl hackers want to comment on
>> my use of IO::File (copied from examples on the internet that showed
>> how to use O_DIRECT)? I am not much of a perl hacker but according to
>> my package manager, IO/File.pm came with perl itself. And the Fcntl
>> eval trick that I copied from File::stat, and the perl-critic
>> suppression that requires?
>
>
> I think you can probably replace a lot of the magic here by simply saying
>
>
> if (Fcntl->can("O_DIRECT")) ...
Fcntl->can() is true for all constants that Fcntl knows about, whether
or not they are defined for your OS. `defined &O_DIRECT` is the simplest
check, see my other reply to Thomas.
> cheers
>
>
> andrew
- ilmari
