Re: How hard would a "no global server" version be? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rob Browning
Subject Re: How hard would a "no global server" version be?
Date
Msg-id 877l90k5aj.fsf@raven.localnet
Whole thread Raw
In response to How hard would a "no global server" version be?  (Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>)
Responses Re: How hard would a "no global server" version be?  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:

> Not specifically. Postgres is a full-up database, and afaik there isn't
> a contingent of our developer community which is sufficiently interested
> to pursue "mini" configurations. But...

Well perhaps I'll become that contingent :>

> Of course we'd prefer that people realize that everything in the
> world would be better if they just had a Postgres server running
> 24x7 ;)

No doubt, but perhaps the "mini" configuration might be an insidious
method of initiating the corruption leading to the "one true way".

-- 
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rob Browning
Date:
Subject: Re: How hard would a "no global server" version be?
Next
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: compressed bitmap indices