Re: list rewrite committed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: list rewrite committed
Date
Msg-id 877juwd6qx.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: list rewrite committed  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: list rewrite committed
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> For instance, here
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-03/msg00696.php are some
> profiles documenting a case where nearly 40% of the runtime goes into
> lappend's in 7.4. I haven't had time to repeat the test case but I'd think
> that time is near-zero in CVS tip.

Of course now ExecEvalExpr's share of runtime in that test is probably up to
28-35% in those tests. Or did you get to doing the things you proposed with
making it a macro?

-- 
greg




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: James Robinson
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump --comment?
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested xacts: looking for testers and review