"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> This falls in the category of "destabilizing the code for purely
> cosmetic reasons", and would be a foolish change to make at RC1 time.
I suppose. Expect to have more bug reports like this one then though.
> We could change the text of the ERROR message reasonably easily,
> but changing the basic transaction abort method is right out.
I fear having a message saying "ERROR This is not an error" is going to get us
laughed at.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!