Re: code coverage patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gregory Stark
Subject Re: code coverage patch
Date
Msg-id 877i9q4ri4.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: code coverage patch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: code coverage patch  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:

> I have uploaded an example run here:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/coverage/
>
> Current test coverage is about 66% overall.

With some pretty glaring gaps: 0% coverage of geqo, 0% coverage of logtape
which implies no tuplesorts are spilling to disk, no coverage of mark/restore
on index scans...

--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about
EnterpriseDB'sPostgreSQL training!
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andriy Bakay
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL SSL problem
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Need more reviewers!