Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Hackers,
>>
>> Just had a feature request from Wheeler, and I don't see why it shouldn't
>> go on our todo list.
>
> I think you're asking for more scriptability in psql. Personally I
> think that would be a great idea, but we need a lot more than what's
> being proposed here. We'll also need loops, conditionals, etc. We've
> had patches for those submitted over the years, but one at a time they
> are easily rejected because they're so obviously incomplete.
FWIW I disagree. I think that's a recipe for ending up with a hacky
turing-complete but awkward-as-hell language.
If you want a language to write arbitrary database driving code with loops,
conditionals, etc then I would recommend going with any of the existing fully
functional languages. You can write your scripts in perl, python, ruby, or
whatever.
If we do it ourselves we'll always have a terrible half-baked language.
Building a whole language with clean syntax and consistent semantics is a lot
of work.
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support!
