Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Gierth
Subject Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
Date
Msg-id 877ftsv0ao.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
List pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
Tom> ... btw, has anyone noticed that this patch broke hamerkop andTom> bowerbird?  Or at least, it's hard to see what
otherrecent commitTom> would explain the failures they're showing.
 

Now that Robert committed the fix for 64bit Datum w/o USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL,
bowerbird seems fixed (hamerkop hasn't run yet).

I see nothing in the win32 stuff that tries to define USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL
on 64-bit windows, is this just an oversight or does it not actually
work there? or is it for on-disk compatibility with 32-bit windows?

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Compile warnings on OSX 10.10 clang 6.0
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan