Tom Lane writes:
>> This is due to an integer overflow in bitshiftright()/bitshiftleft()
>> leading to them recursively calling each other. Patch attached.
>
> Seems sane, though I wonder if it'd be better to use -INT_MAX rather
> than -VARBITMAXLEN.
I am undecided between those two. -INT_MAX might be a more precise fix
for the problem, but the extra distance to the danger zone was kind of
soothing :-).
regards,
Andreas
