Re: [HACKERS] postgres 9.6.2 update breakage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Subject Re: [HACKERS] postgres 9.6.2 update breakage
Date
Msg-id 877f1j90ii.fsf@gnu.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] postgres 9.6.2 update breakage  (Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>)
Re: [HACKERS] postgres 9.6.2 update breakage  (Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Roel Janssen writes:

> So, it would be something like:
> postgres pg_upgrade \
> ...

It's great to have a recipe `that works', so thanks!

However, whether or not we automate this, I cannot help to wonder if
we should support downgrading -- at least to the previous version
in this case?

If I'm not mistaken, everything else in GuixSD will run if I select a
previous system generation in Grub...except for this?

Is involving postgres developers an option, I'm sure a least one of
the postgresql hackers[cc] are already looking at Guix[SD]?

Greetings,
janneke

--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar®  http://AvatarAcademy.nl



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: amul sul
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Next
From: Ildus Kurbangaliev
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues for foreigntables