Re: Minor bug in src/port/rint.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Minor bug in src/port/rint.c
Date
Msg-id 8774.1206422437@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Minor bug in src/port/rint.c  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Minor bug in src/port/rint.c  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Added to TODO:
>         o Fix port/rint.c to be spec-compliant

Actually, the TODO I had in mind was entirely not that.  Getting exact
spec compliance in a completely platform-independent fashion is probably
impossible, and is certainly not worth the trouble in view of the fact
that every SUS-compliant platform provides a working rint() already.
The proper wording of this item is
* Find a correct rint() substitute on Windows
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GSoC] (Is it OK to choose items without % mark in theToDoList) && (is it an acceptable idea to build index on Flash Disk)
Next
From: mx
Date:
Subject: Re: [GSoC] (Is it OK to choose items without % mark in theToDoList) && (is it an acceptable idea to build index on Flash Disk)