Re: tkConfig.sh vs. ./configure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: tkConfig.sh vs. ./configure
Date
Msg-id 8771.1008862961@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to tkConfig.sh vs. ./configure  (Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 10:20:34AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What packaging of tcl/tk did you use?

>  Latest unstable GNU/Linux Debian. Tcl 8.3.3-1, Tk 8.3.3-1.

I think the Debian packager blew it.

I just looked at a Red Hat 7.2 machine, and it has both tclConfig.sh
and tkConfig.sh in /usr/lib.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: tkConfig.sh vs. ./configure
Next
From: Jussi Mikkola
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.2 is slow?