Re: GROUPING - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Gierth
Subject Re: GROUPING
Date
Msg-id 87617lzyqi.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GROUPING  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Andres" == Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:

 Andres> I'd vote for either 0) do nothing or 1). I think the use case
 Andres> for specifying 64+ (or even 32+) columns in grouping is pretty
 Andres> darn slim. And as you said, it's not that hard to work around
 Andres> it if you need it, and that's only going to be in an automated
 Andres> fashion anyway.

If the vote goes with (1), this patch ought to suffice:

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: GROUPING
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres and TLSv1.2