Re: Why is parula failing? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Why is parula failing?
Date
Msg-id 875482.1715642958@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why is parula failing?  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> I've not seen any recent failures from Parula that relate to this
> issue.  The last one seems to have been about 4 weeks ago.

> I'm now wondering if it's time to revert the debugging code added in
> 1db689715.  Does anyone think differently?

+1.  It seems like we wrote off the other issue as a compiler bug,
so I don't have much trouble assuming that this one was too.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding the extension name to EData / log_line_prefix
Next
From: Paul Jungwirth
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 application time