>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> The patch in the original email is in text/plain with base64 transfer
>> encoding, which means that CRLF line endings are mandatory. It's
>> actually up to the receiving MUA (or the archives webserver) to undo
>> that.
>>
>> If the archives webserver isn't handling that then it's a bug there.
Andrew> Probably a good reason not to use text/plain for patches, ISTM.
Andrew> I do note that my MUA (Thunderbird) uses text/x-patch and
Andrew> probably violates RFC2046 4.1.1
The first patch of yours I found was in text/x-patch with 7bit transfer
encoding, so the line endings are actually those of the mail message
itself (i.e. CRLF on the wire).
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
