Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Or make a version of palloc that zeroes the memory.
Well, we might lose a bit of speed that way -- with the current
MemSet() macro, most of the tests that MemSet() does can be eliminated
at compile-time, since MemSet() is usually called with some constant
parameters. If we moved this code inside palloc(), it wouldn't be
possible to do this constant propagation.
Not sure it would make a big performance difference, though -- and I
think palloc() is a clean solution. In fact, it's probably worth
having anyway: a lot of the call sites of palloc() immediately zero
the memory after they allocate it...
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
