Re: failed to re-find parent key - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: failed to re-find parent key
Date
Msg-id 871xq3ck8g.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: failed to re-find parent key  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> Hmm.  Compiler bug maybe?  I can't recall if gcc 2.96 had a good
> reputation or not.  

2.96's reputation is of being *THE* canonical bad version of gcc.

mplayer for example has a configure check that specifically makes it difficult
to compile with 2.96 without reading large warnings because they've had too
many bug reports get tracked down to it:
   Note for gcc 2.96 users: Some versions of this compiler are known to miscompile   mplayer and lame (which is used
formencoder).  If you get compile errors,   first upgrade to the latest 2.96 release (minimum 2.96-85) and try again.
Ifthe problem still exists, try with gcc 3.x (or 2.95.x) *BEFORE* reporting   bugs!
 
           GCC 2.96 IS NOT AND WILL NOT BE SUPPORTED BY US !

-- 
greg



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: failed to re-find parent key
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: failed to re-find parent key