Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't! - Mailing list pgsql-hackers-win32

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
Date
Msg-id 8690.1103904211@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!  (Gary Doades <gpd@gpdnet.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
List pgsql-hackers-win32
Gary Doades <gpd@gpdnet.co.uk> writes:
> AFAIK Win32 does not care where in private process address space the
> "shared memory" segment is. It can be mapped to different addresses in
> different processes and still share the same physical address space.
> This is why Win32 puts the private shared address anywhere in its own
> address space, because it doesn't matter.

Win32 may not care, but we do.  The shared memory segment must be mapped
at the same address in every backend.

> If you try to force it to any particular private process address you may
> fail as you don't always know where program code (DLLs etc.) may be loaded.

This is (or ought to be) irrelevant, because we are only talking about
instances of a single executable.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date:

Previous
From: Gary Doades
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
Next
From: Gary Doades
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!