Re: config files in /data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: config files in /data
Date
Msg-id 8670.959906615@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: config files in /data  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> The distinction between /global and /internal is a little bit artificial
>> (which one does pg_log belong in?  It's only sort of a table...),

> Is there any reason these special tables are catalogued?

I can't think of a reason to catalog pg_log offhand, but maybe Vadim
knows one...

> Also, with the catalog version number, is there any more use for the
> PG_VERSION file?

Sure.  The catalog number is just for internal purposes; you can't use
it (easily) to tell which release you have.  PG_VERSION is more
appropriate for user interface purposes.  Also, consider pg_upgrade:
it wouldn't have any simple way of checking for compatibility without
PG_VERSION.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: AW: Proposal for enhancements of privilege system
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: disbursion again