Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions
Date
Msg-id 864392.1639630974@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> writes:
> I think you missed a few parts though ?

Um.  I think those are leftover from when I was intending the
cutoff to be 9.0 not 9.2.  I'll take a fresh look tomorrow.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel vacuum comments
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side