Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code
Date
Msg-id 864247.1593719063@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:39 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> mumble ssize_t mumble

> That's from POSIX, though. I imagine MSVC won't be happy (surprise!).

We've got quite a few uses of it already, so apparently it's fine.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code
Next
From: James Coleman
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code