Re: MOVE LAST: why? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: MOVE LAST: why?
Date
Msg-id 863.1042000401@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MOVE LAST: why?  (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Sure.  FETCH n in Postgres has always corresponded to FETCH RELATIVE n.

> IIRC in SQL standard FETCH retrieves rows one by one.

Yes, Postgres' idea of FETCH is only weakly related to the spec's idea.
But I believe you get similar results if you consider only the row last
returned by our FETCH.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: MOVE LAST: why?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: MOVE LAST: why?