Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
> I guess you mix up SQL99's "trasnlate" and "convert".
No, I believe Peter has read the spec correctly. Further down they have
<character translation> is a function for changing each character of a given string according to some
many-to-oneor one-to-one mapping between two not necessarily distinct character sets.
So this is intended as a one-character-at-a-time mapping, not a language
translation (which would be far beyond what anyone would expect of a
database anyway).
One thing that's really unclear to me is what's the difference between
a <character translation> and a <form-of-use conversion>, other than
that they didn't provide a syntax for defining new conversions.
regards, tom lane
