On 2025-08-19 Tu 10:14 AM, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 at 15:33, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am able to reproduce the regression you mentioned but both
>> regressions are %20 on my end. I found that (by experimenting) SIMD
>> causes a regression if it advances less than 5 characters.
>>
>> So, I implemented a small heuristic. It works like that:
>>
>> - If advance < 5 -> insert a sleep penalty (n cycles).
> 'sleep' might be a poor word choice here. I meant skipping SIMD for n
> number of times.
>
I was thinking a bit about that this morning. I wonder if it might be
better instead of having a constantly applied heuristic like this, it
might be better to do a little extra accounting in the first, say, 1000
lines of an input file, and if less than some portion of the input is
found to be special characters then switch to the SIMD code. What that
portion should be would need to be determined by some experimentation
with a variety of typical workloads, but given your findings 20% seems
like a good starting point.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
