Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)
Date
Msg-id 8602.1492280001@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Sure. Just means putting this code a bit later in the file. "make check"
> is only one initdb, so it won't cost much. I'm still inclined to force a
> TAP test for initdb with no TZ set, though.

I'd like that to be an additional tweak for some existing test case
rather than expending a whole initdb run just for that --- but otherwise,
no objection.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Self-signed certificate instructions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Typo in htup_details.h