On 2026-04-21 Tu 9:54 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've noticed a few buildfarm failures similar to [1]:
>
> # diff -U3 /repos/client-code-REL_19_1/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/pl/plpgsql/src/expected/plpgsql_trap.out
/repos/client-code-REL_19_1/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/pl/plpgsql/src/results/plpgsql_trap.out
> # --- /repos/client-code-REL_19_1/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/pl/plpgsql/src/expected/plpgsql_trap.out 2026-04-21
04:22:01.030204342-0300
> # +++ /repos/client-code-REL_19_1/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/pl/plpgsql/src/results/plpgsql_trap.out 2026-04-21
04:29:54.795187855-0300
> # @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
> # begin;
> # set statement_timeout to 1000;
> # select trap_timeout();
> # -NOTICE: nyeah nyeah, can't stop me
> # +NOTICE: caught others?
> # ERROR: end of function
> # CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function trap_timeout() line 15 at RAISE
> # rollback;
> not ok 11 - plpgsql_trap 502 ms
>
> which is coming from unexpected behavior of this bit of plpgsql
> code:
>
> begin
> -- we assume this will take longer than 1 second:
> select count(*) into x from generate_series(1, 1_000_000_000_000);
> exception
> when others then
> raise notice 'caught others?';
> when query_canceled then
> raise notice 'nyeah nyeah, can''t stop me';
> end;
>
> The light bulb went on when I noticed a nearby failure from the same
> machine that was clearly traceable to out-of-disk-space. What
> happened here, I have no doubt, was that the "from generate_series"
> bit tried to make a large temporary file, ran out of space, and threw
> an appropriate error, causing us to take the "wrong" exception
> handler.
>
> Proposal:
>
> 1. Replace that query with something not so resource-intensive.
> I'm not really sure why we didn't just use "perform pg_sleep(10)".
> Maybe it didn't exist or didn't reliably wait 10 seconds at the
> time, but it does now.
>
> 2. Adjust the "when others" handler to report the actual error,
> to make this sort of thing easier to debug next time.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> [1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=caiman&dt=2026-04-21%2007%3A21%3A57
Sounds good.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
