Re: Postgres-XL - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From SQL Padawan
Subject Re: Postgres-XL
Date
Msg-id 85RGbgzOr-M5AWyHpnx6XqpZa5MELRdlfvtDO2VQ648MvsE0NPJ8UGtMKwBmOQ5OdnRa391MYlrmTkEmWIkvY-jY7qDdGsh2FPzI781YE1Y=@protonmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres-XL  (Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>)
List pgsql-admin

On Saturday, November 27th, 2021 at 17:12, Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> wrote:

> Στις 27/11/21 7:01 μ.μ., ο/η SQL Padawan έγραψε:

> > > Postgres-XL is not exactly a replication solution but it is ACID compliant and it doesn't have problem with
sequences.It is a decent high availability solution. More information is available here: https://www.postgres-xl.org/ 
> > >
> > > It hasn't moved in almost 3 years? A Marie-Céleste project?

> You know that "free" in software is one thing and "free" beer another.

Yes of course - and I'm not criticising or pointing fingers at anyone involved in that project.

It's just that it has been **my experience** that software always has issues - esp. a piece of distributed software
whosefoundation is also v. complex. 

PostgreSQL 10 is at version 19 - the XL project hasn't moved since 10.1 - doesn't inspire confidence in me anyway - and
Ipersonally would be very hesitant about recommending what is, AFAICS, abandon-ware. 

YMMV - with all respect,

SQLP!





pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Achilleas Mantzios
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres-XL
Next
From: Gaurav Anand
Date:
Subject: PGXN installation failure for Postgres Image of PostgreSQL 12 and 13 versions.