Re: Fixing insecure security definer functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Fixing insecure security definer functions
Date
Msg-id 8581.1171598177@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fixing insecure security definer functions  ("Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Fixing insecure security definer functions  ("Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> yikes!

> If you guys go through with forcing functions to attach to objects
> when they are created, it will break almost every project I've ever
> worked on :(.  The schema/function combo fits into all kinds of de
> facto partitioning strategies and organization methods.

If you read a bit further, I did suggest providing an option to retain
the current behavior.  I don't think it should be the default though.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Chatter on DROP SOMETHING IF EXISTS
Next
From: Hideyuki Kawashima
Date:
Subject: Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS