Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at> writes:
>> And isn't the patch going in quite the wrong
>> direction for nested transactions?
> Our (Alvaro's and my) current understanding is that snapshots are not
> influenced by nested transactions.
What was that long article Alvaro posted yesterday, then? He definitely
came to the conclusion that nested transactions need different
QuerySnapshots, and I think it was still open whether they need
different SerializableSnapshots.
regards, tom lane
