Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)
Date
Msg-id 85508ddd-613c-dd26-cff1-845f6175ff61@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)  (Russell Foster <russell.foster.coding@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On 11/10/20 7:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> That's unlikely, I think. The regression tests are constructed so that
>> the estimates are stable. It's more likely this is some difference in
>> rounding behavior, for example.
> 
> The reported delta is in the actual row count, not an estimate.
> How could that be subject to roundoff issues?  And there's no
> delta in the Append's inputs, so this seems like it's a flat-out
> miss of a row count in EXPLAIN ANALYZE.
> 

My bad. I've not noticed it's EXPLAIN ANALYZE (COSTS OFF) so I thought
it's estimates. You're right this can't be a roundoff error.

>> I wonder which msvc builds are used on the machines that fail/pass
>> the tests, and if the compiler flags are the same.
> 
> Yeah, this might be a fruitful way to figure out "what's different
> from the buildfarm".
> 

Yeah. Also Russell claims to have two "same" machines out of which one
works and the other one fails.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange behavior with polygon and NaN