Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8
Date
Msg-id 8546.1034858750@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> Well, I'm not happy with defining _GNU_SOURCE, but I don't agree that
> just saying "it's a Perl problem" is a good answer. That may well be
> the case, but it doesn't change the fact that a lot of people are
> running 5.8.0, and will probably continue to do so during the 7.3
> lifecycle[1]. We work around braindamage on other systems -- strictely
> speaking, we could say "the snprintf() bug with 64-bit Solaris is a
> Sun libc problem", for example.

Well, I'm not opposed to a workaround in principle; I'm just unconvinced
that this is the right solution.  Do we understand what is broken and
why -D_GNU_SOURCE fixes it?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lee Kindness
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY syntax
Next
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Current CVS has strange parser for float type