request for tuning suggestions from PC Week Labs - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Timothy Dyck
Subject request for tuning suggestions from PC Week Labs
Date
Msg-id 85256876.00214826.00@mailer.zd.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [ADMIN] request for tuning suggestions from PC Week Labs  (Ragnar Kjørstad <postgres@ragnark.vestdata.no>)
List pgsql-admin


Hi all, I'm the database analyst for PC Week Labs and am comparing
PostgreSQL with Inprise's InterBase (which will be open sourced later this
year). As part of this project, I'm running a benchmark with a mix of OLTP
and DSS queries in a set of various mixes and at a variety of user loads
(up to 100 concurrent users). I'd like to get your tuning suggestions on
the engine to make sure I am not missing anything.

My test server is a departmental-type machine with two Pentium III 450MHz
CPUs with 512MB of RAM running RedHat Linux 6.1. PGDATA is pointing to a
RAID 5 array and the database is ~40 MB of data before indexing, and so
will fit entirely into the db cache. The OS swapfile is not used at all. I
will be using ODBC to query the database.

1. The biggest performance item I've seen in looking through the mailing
lists is the fsync option. I want to leave this enabled as I don't think a
transactional database should ever lose data. My understanding is that
with it on PG checkpoints after every commit. Is there a way to let the
log grow to a certain size before checkpointing? When fsync is off, how is
data loss possible?

2. How do I move the log to a different spindle from the disks the
database data is on?

3. Any other suggestions are much appreciated.

Regards,
Tim Dyck
Senior Analyst, PC Week Labs
timothy_dyck@zd.com



pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] migrating administrative pieces to new install
Next
From: Brad Bonkoski
Date:
Subject: pg_dump question...