Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Date
Msg-id 84fc5fed-9cfb-4275-92fc-6e148d95b0f7@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files  (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>)
Responses Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
List pgsql-hackers
On 2025-10-06 Mo 12:00 PM, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Oct-03, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Would it be unreasonable to discard the "check" target altogether?
>> It made sense back in the day when actually building the html docs
>> took many minutes.  But I haven't used it in years, so I wonder
>> if anyone else has either.
> I wouldn't particularly appreciate that.  Doing "make check" takes 0.6
> seconds for me, while the HTML build is 28 seconds.  It's quite a
> difference.
>

OK, so I think that one's not going to fly. We could keep the check 
target and also run the checks as part of building postgres-full.sgml.

It's less clear to me how to do that in meson, though, since you can 
only have a single command in a custom target.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimize LISTEN/NOTIFY
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files