Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Gunnar \"Nick\" Bluth
Subject Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification
Date
Msg-id 84ced441-e4d8-c5b9-ea15-561e0c2b5d92@pro-open.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Am 02.06.23 um 00:31 schrieb Adrian Klaver:

> 2) How are the questions and answers developed without leaking the 
> information out to test takers?
I guess it'd make sense to ask the LPI folks how they handle this.

Maybe we could even slip under their umbrella, once the community agrees 
on a (closed) group working on the actual exam questions...?

Just my 2p,
-- 
Gunnar "Nick" Bluth

Eimermacherweg 106
D-48159 Münster

Mobil +49 172 8853339
Email: gunnar.bluth@pro-open.de
__________________________________________________________________________
"Ceterum censeo SystemD esse delendam" - Cato


Attachment

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification
Next
From: Katherine Mcmillan
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification