Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol
Date
Msg-id 84a8f3d6-333d-1606-ac66-259a10898e6c@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Responses Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 7/2/16 3:54 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> In related news, RFC 7677 that describes a new SCRAM-SHA-256
> authentication mechanism, was published in November 2015. It's identical
> to SCRAM-SHA-1, which is what this patch set implements, except that
> SHA-1 has been replaced with SHA-256. Perhaps we should forget about
> SCRAM-SHA-1 and jump straight to SCRAM-SHA-256.

I think a global change from SHA-1 to SHA-256 is in the air already, so 
if we're going to release something brand new in 2017 or so, it should 
be SHA-256.

I suspect this would be a relatively simple change, so I wouldn't mind 
seeing a SHA-1-based variant in CF1 to get things rolling.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion