Re: SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)
Date
Msg-id 8494.1105520023@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release  (Reinhard Max <max@suse.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Not sure what is going on here: why is SUSE not listed on the supported
> platforms list? (still)

I haven't seen any reports of passes on SUSE.  I have zero doubt that PG
works on SUSE, since it's pretty much exactly like every other Linux,
but there's been no specific reports on the lists AFAIR.

> ...is it because Reinhard seems resistant (after private conversation)
> to the idea of submitting a formal port report via HACKERS, like
> everybody else?

See above.

> ...or is it because his postings to ANNOUNCE that the port to SUSE have
> gone unnoticed by those that compile the supported platforms list?

If he insists on posting such routine stuff to pgsql-announce, he should
not be too surprised that his postings do not get approved.  That isn't
the correct forum.  We don't peruse the New York Times classified ads
for such reports, either ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)
Next
From:
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)