Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1
Date
Msg-id 8491.1193463449@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1  (Anton <anton200@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1  (Anton <anton200@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Tree view 
Anton <anton200@gmail.com> writes:
> I want ask about problem with partioned tables (it was discussed some
> time ago, see below). Is it fixed somehow in 8.2.5 ?

No.  The patch you mention never was considered at all, since it
consisted of a selective quote from Greenplum source code.  It would
not even compile in community Postgres, because it adds calls to half a
dozen Greenplum routines that we've never seen.  Not to mention that
the base of the diff is Greenplum proprietary code, so the patch itself
wouldn't even apply successfully.

As to whether it would work if we had the full story ... well, not
having the full story, I don't want to opine.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Pablo Alcaraz
Date:
Subject: Re: Speed difference between select ... union select ... and select from partitioned_table
Next
From: Anton
Date:
Subject: Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1