Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:27:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Or you could do like setrefs.c does, and assume you know how to
>> calculate the hash value for an OID-keyed cache.
> Ok, the hashoid() hack works. But please take it as report from
> the ground that this API is useful outside of core and it would
> be good if it stays useful.
Well, you have a point there --- what setrefs.c is doing is already
pretty grotty, and it would get more so if we added tracking of other
objects that used non-OID cache keys (though I'm not sure what those
would be).
We could expose some macros patterned after SearchSysCacheN that
take a cache identifier plus the same key values that would be
needed to search that cache, and return the hash value. Does that
seem reasonable?
regards, tom lane
